Interview with Georgia Brady-Tompt
1.You have a clear interest in cartography and mention mapping as a method for designating space in your creative narrative. How is this reflected in your work?
I like maps, I like the idea of mapping space. Im fascinated with how people build and live in cities, how we construct and how we document. For me, the map is diagrammatically archiving a landscape. I like to think my sculptures achieve the same thing. I use materials from both industrial or domestic scenes, some recognizable like skirting board or architrave. I like to think the sculptures are digesting architecture. I am inspired by architectural drawings and models. Cartography and map making as a method of scientifically transcribing landscapes into readable, reliable diagrams, inherently has flaws. The Map Maker has the power to control this diagram’s purpose, context, and application; through its key, or it is important to deconstruct the map, to understand what it shows and for what purpose. Cartography serves as a conceptual framework that allows me to explore and reinterpret the spaces we inhibit. When thinking about this in the application of my sculptures in a space, their relationship with the space is important. By emphasizing or diminishing certain aspects of the existing architecture, there is a power dynamic between whats there already and what’s added. Individually, the sculptures function like a map. They are transcriptions of spaces, or rather a proposition of spaces.The titles of the sculptures. Installations as material maps. The straight line as purest inorganic thing.Frame of reference. Foreground. Working closely with the grid. The map also exists in the traces of the materials. Wood found from that places Ive been, a map that only would make sense to me, the map maker. I am interested in the play with relevancy. To what extent is it necessary for others to know the details of the material. These are things to play with. SELF QUOTATION.
2.In your installation pieces, there are often combinations of many everyday objects, particularly materials from working systems, such as radiators and desk fans. Why do you choose them, and how do you apply them?
The objects Ive been working with usually are components of airflow systems; fans didactically create and stifle. When creating the installation for the Degree Show I created drawings that lined the airflow starting from the ceiling fan, flowing down into and around the room. I wanted visual reminders throughout the pieces.
3.You emphasize the dynamic or unstable nature of sculpture. Indeed, you do this by constantly dismantling and reorganizing your work according to different exhibition spaces. How do you seek and present the transient relationship between your works and the spaces? What does this mean to you?
For me, the pieces have an endless lifespan, these materials are permanent, why not make their iterations so too?
4.Your artistic practice has progressed from oil painting to sculpture and installation, with space consistently being a thread (whether psychological space or physical space). How do you choose the forms and mediums for your creations?
For me painting and sculpture use different parts of the brain. I am not concerned with context when painting it is purely about form. I think about creating space through the paintings rather that constructing them. They are sort of the inverse of the sculptures. A reflection? Concave? Digging out? Internal space? They end up being quite solemn. Psychological?
5.According to the nature of your work, CHAPTER 6 Gallery has invited you to arrive in Shanghai, China in advance to engage with the gallery space and explore the possibilities of reconfiguring your works within this new environment. What plans do you have for this?
I want to play with information, or more specifically, access to information. I want there to be an element of discovery in which information is hidden. I want to play with the existing architecture of the space. To requote, self referential, Curious element of the public and private. To be invited to share space.
6.If you were to summarize your creative expression in brief, what would it be?
The reverse ruin.